41Risk Assessment and Consequence Modeling of Propane Escaping from Pipe in Tehran Oil Refining Company (Shahid Tond Gouyan)


Abstract:

Considering the fact that Propane pipelines have potential risk in the oil Sites implementing crisis management realistically, requires that the consequences of probable accidents scientifically explored and assessed. Any leakage in pipes can lead to fire, explosion, equipment damage, or toxicity to the personnel or people around, so that the impact and severity of any incident should be modeled to be assessable and predictable. Thus, in case of any leakage incidents the severity of toxic, combustible or explosive liquid/gas must be evaluated by HSE Units in order to minimize the loss. In this article, for modeling consequences, ALOHA software is used to help assess the extent of the risks in Tehran Oil Refining Company (ShahidTondGouyan) and CAMEO MARPLOT software shows it on map. ALOHA results show that AEGL-3 is at most 361 m (more than 33000 ppm), AEGL-2 is about 575 m (more than 17000 ppm) & AEGL-1 is about 1.2 km (more than 5500 ppm). Till 499 m (lower explosive limit) LEL is more than 21000 ppm, to 701 m 60% LEL is 12600 ppm and to 2.1 km 10% LEL is more than 2100 ppm which can cause an incident. Overpressure (blast force) threat zone has no pressure more than 8 psi to destruct buildings, but serious injury likely is probable in pressure greater than 3.5 psi that is until the 515 m and more than 1.0 psi can shatter glasses to 639 meters from origin. Tehran oil refining company has considered both Suitable safe distance of refinery from city and appropriate PPE in the various levels of risk for its personnel, so that neither of them is highly at risk.

Keywords: risk assessment, consequence Modeling, propane pipelines, crisis management, ALOHA.

References:

  • J.Hillairet, D.Voyer, B. Frincu, O. Meneghini, A.Ekedahl, and M. Goniche, Modeling of lower hybrid antennas using the ALOHA code and comparisons with Tore Supra experiments, Fusion Engineering and Design, 84, pp. 953–955, 2009.

  • NOAA and U.S. EPA., ALOHA 5.2.3 Online Help, Office of Response and Restoration of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection, Seattle, WA, USA, 1999.

  • R.M.Darbra, M. Demichela, and S.Murè, Preliminary risk assessment of eco toxic substances accidental releases in major risk installations through fuzzy logic, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 86, 103–111,2008.

  • W.Shukun, Risk Analysis of Fire and Explosion in the Combustion System of Natural Gas Power Generation, Electric safety technology 6, 11-13, 2004.

  •  W.Wenjing, S. Biao, G.Kaihua, Quantitative Risk Analysis for LNG Station Accidents, Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 7, 114-117,2011.

  • A. M.Shariff, N. Abdul Wahab, R.Rusli., Assessing the hazards from a BLEVE and minimizing its impacts using the inherent safety concept. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1-12,2016.

  • A.M.Shariff, N.A.Wahab, Inherent fire consequence estimation tool (IFCET) for preliminary design of process plant, Fire Saf. J. 59, 47-54,2013.

  • L.Hughes, The effects of event occurrence and duration on resilience and adaptation in energy systems, Energy;84:443–54, 2015

  • JL.Adgate, BD.Goldstein, LM.McKenzie, Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development, Environ Sci Technol;48:830720,2014.

  • K.A. Werner, S.Vink, K. Watt, P.Jagals, Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural GA development: A review of the current strength of evidence, Science of the Total Environment 505,1127–1141,2015.

  • SL.Cutter, KD.Ash, CT.Emrich, The geographies of community disaster resilience, Global Environ Change 29:65–77,2014.

  • M.Khalili, S.Amindeldar, Traditional solutions in low energy buildings of hotarid regions of Iran, Sustain Cities Soc13, 171–81, 2014.

  • AF. Roberts, Thermal radiation hazards from releases of LPG from pressurized storage, J Fire Saf.4, 197-212, 1982.

  • L. Zarate,J. Arnaldos,J, Casal, Establishing safety distances for wildland fires, J Fire Saf, 43, 565–575.2008.

  • Zh.Jianwen, L. Da, Risk Analysis of Jet Fire Radiation in the Leakage Accident of Natural Gas Pipeline, Journal of Safety and Environment, 11, 233-236, 2011.

  • J.Huanyong, H. Li, Sh. Yong, Leakage Consequence Simulation and Quantitative Risk Assessment on Gas Off-Take Station, Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation 28, 23-26,2009.

  • NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/. (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-149. 2016.

  • J. Martchamadol,S.Kumar, Thailand’s energy security indicators. Renew Sustain Energy Rev,16, 6103–22,2012.

  • X.Yabo, Q.Xinming, L.Zhenyi, Quantitative Risk Analysis on the Leakage of Compressed Natural Gas Pipeline, China Safety Science Journal 18, 146-149,2008.

  • N.Bariha, I. Mani Mishra, V. Chandra Srivastava, Hazard analysis of failure of natural gas and petroleum gas pipelines, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 40, 217-226,2016.

  • Z.Huang, J.Li, Assessment of fire risk of gas pipeline leakage in cities and towns In: International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology,ProcediaEng, 45, 77-82,2012.

  • A.M.Shariff,C.T.Leong, Inherent risk assessment: A new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 87, 371–376,2009.

  • L. Zhang, Simulation of the transient flow in a natural gas compression system using a high-order upwind scheme considering the real-gas behaviors, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 28, 479-490,2016.

  • Y.P.I,C.M. Shu, and C.H.Chong, Applications of 3D QRA technique to the fire/explosion simulation and hazard mitigation within a naphtha-cracking plant, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 22, 506–515,2009.

  • R.Ohba,A.Kouchi, T. Hara,V. Vieillard, and D.Nedelka, Validation of heavy and light gas dispersion models for the safety analysis of LNG tank, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 17, 325–337, 2004.

  • M.H. Hassim, M.Hurme, Occupational chemical exposure and risk estimation in process development and design, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 88, 225–235,2010.

  • J.A.Suardin, A.J.McPhateJr, A.Sipkema, M.Childs, and M.S.Mannan, Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): An effective screening and comparison tool, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 87, 147–160, 2009.

  • US Environmental Protection Agency, free application ALOHA, Version 5.4.6, Feb 2016. I.R of Iran Meteorological Organization, 2016. www.irimo.ir

  • H.Hui, D. Guoning, Risk quantitative calculation and ALOHA simulation on the leakage accident of natural gas power plant,Procedia Engineering 45, 352 – 359,2012.

  • N.Bariha, I.M.Mishra, V.C.Srivastava, Analysis of fire and explosion hazards during surface transport of liquefied petroleum gas: a case study, hazards 24. In: Symposium No. 159 IChemE, International Conference, Edinburg, (UK), 2014.

  • S.j.Tong, S.m. Lo, P.h.Zhang, B.z.Chen, Jet fire consequences evaluation on the natural gas transported by pipelines, Procedia Eng. 52, 349-354, 2013.

  • L.Malys, M.Musy, C.Inard, A hydrothermal model to assess the impact of green walls on urban microclimate and building energy consumption, Build Environ,73:18797, 2014.

  • R.Hille, Assessment of conventional and radiological risks for the handling of hazardous substances in a research center, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 80, 298–304,2002.