60 Parametric Study of Methanol Reformer Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production Using Artificial Neural Network


Abstract:

Efforts to find eco-friendly fuels have attracted researchers’ attention to hydrogen and its production methods. In the present study, hydrogen recovery in a membrane reactor with a Pd-Ag catalyst for hydrogen production was simulated. For this purpose, the multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) were used. Moreover, implementing intelligent methods for simulation require a dataset, so 60 datasets were applied. The effects of parameters such as temperature, pressure and dimensionless length of reactor on the hydrogen recovery in the membrane reactor were investigated. The results show that the MLP method had a high adaptation to experimental data and had the best performance in prediction. Intelligent techniques can be used to reduce the computational time and increase the accuracy of the techniques. The values of the RMSE and R2 evaluation criteria for the best model are 0.3274 and 0.9997, respectively.

Keyword: hydrogen production, methanol reforming, membrane reactor, hydrogen recovery, intelligent methods

References:

  • [1]      T. A. Semelsberger, “Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Production from Dimethyl Ether Steam Reforming and Hydrolysis,” Los Alamos Natl. Lab, 2004.

    [2]      D. Das and T. N. Veziroǧlu, “Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2001.

    [3]      J. D. Holladay, J. Hu, D. L. King, and Y. Wang, “An overview of hydrogen production technologies,” Catal. today, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 244–260, 2009.

    [4]      W.-H. Cheng, Methanol production and use. CRC Press, 1994.

    [5]      J. K. Paul, “Methanol technology and application in motor fuels,” 1978.

    [6]      P. J. De Wild and M. Verhaak, “Catalytic production of hydrogen from methanol,” Catal. Today, vol. 60, no. 1–2, pp. 3–10, 2000.

    [7]      R. Zapf et al., “Detailed characterization of various porous alumina-based catalyst coatings within microchannels and their testing for methanol steam reforming,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 721–729, 2003.

    [8]      O. J. Kwon, D. H. Yoon, and J. J. Kim, “Silicon-based miniaturized reformer with methanol catalytic burner,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 140, no. 1–3, pp. 466–472, 2008.

    [9]      J. Bravo, A. Karim, T. Conant, G. P. Lopez, and A. Datye, “Wall coating of a CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 methanol steam reforming catalyst for micro-channel reformers,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 101, no. 1–3, pp. 113–121, 2004.

    [10]    A. Basile et al., “Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming carried out in membrane reactor on Cu/Zn/Mg-based catalyst,” Catal. Today, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2008.

    [11]    S. Sie, J. Tang, and J. Chang, “Study on Aluminum Plates Coated with a Zirconia-sol and Catalyst Mixture for Methanol Steam-reforming in a Rectangular Reactor,” 2009.

    [12]    K. Ghasemzadeh et al., “Hydrogen production via silica membrane reactor during the methanol steam reforming process: experimental study,” RSC Adv., vol. 5, no. 116, pp. 95823–95832, 2015.

    [13]    F. Wang and G. Wang, “ScienceDirect Performance and cold spot effect of methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production in,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 38, pp. 16835–16841, 2016.

    [14]    H. Ma, M. Zhou, W. Ying, and D. Fang, “Two-dimensional modeling of a plant-scale fixed-bed reactor for hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, pp. 1–12, 2016.

    [15]    M. Saidi, “ScienceDirect Performance assessment and evaluation of catalytic membrane reactor for pure hydrogen production via steam reforming of methanol,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, pp. 1–16, 2017.

    [16]    E. K. P. Chong and S. H. Zak, An introduction to optimization, vol. 76. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

    [17]    K.-L. Du and M. N. S. Swamy, Neural networks in a softcomputing framework. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.

    [18]    M. H. Hassoun, Fundamentals of artificial neural networks. MIT press, 1995.

    [19]    L. N. De Castro and F. J. Von Zuben, “Optimised training techniques for feedforward neural networks,” State Univ. Campinas, Sao Paulo-SP-Brazil, Tech. Report, DCA-RT, vol. 3, p. 98, 1998.

    [20]    A. A. Dehghani, M. Piri, M. Hesam, And N. Dehghani, “Estimation Of Daily Pan Evaporation By Using Mlp, Rbf And Recuurent Neural Networks,” 2010.

    [21]    H. R. Baghaee, M. Mirsalim, G. B. Gharehpetian, and H. A. Talebi, “Generalized three phase robust load-flow for radial and meshed power systems with and without uncertainty in energy resources using dynamic radial basis functions neural networks,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 174, pp. 96–113, 2018.